OpenADMET launches a blinded molecular-structure challenge
OpenADMET’s new CYP3A4 structure track supplies 20 molecular inputs and hidden experimental references, offering a prospective test of both structural accuracy and chemical plausibility.
OpenADMET’s September 25 Structure Track asks entrants to predict how 20 compounds bind the drug-metabolizing enzyme CYP3A4 before the experimental answers are revealed.
A molecular model can look persuasive when the correct structure is already familiar; a blinded test asks whether it can recover the relevant geometry first.
The organizers have resolved the reference complexes by cryo-electron microscopy and are withholding those structures during prediction. Participants receive molecular descriptions and must submit their proposed protein–ligand complexes. This adds a structural task to the challenge’s existing direct and time-dependent inhibition tracks, connecting two different kinds of evidence without pretending they are interchangeable.
The distinction has practical force. An enzyme-binding pose concerns how a molecule sits in a protein. Inhibition concerns what happens to enzyme activity. Neither, alone, establishes the effect of a medicine in a patient. A structural benchmark can nevertheless reveal a failure that would be difficult to see in an aggregate prediction score.
Chemical plausibility is part of the assessment. Predictions that fail PoseBusters checks receive a zero primary structural score. A visually close arrangement with physically implausible geometry is therefore not treated as a successful answer. The rules make the scientific constraint part of the score rather than leaving it to a persuasive rendering.
The public notebook prepares inputs and checks submission formatting; it does not run the full prediction model. Teams still need their chosen method and computing resources. Final submissions are due November 3 at 23:59 UTC, with a model report required for final-leaderboard inclusion. For a molecular-software team, this is a concrete opportunity to evaluate a method prospectively and make its failure cases informative.
Take it further
Enter the OpenADMET structure challenge · Deadline: 3 November 2026Submit 20 complexes and the required model report before the final deadline. The tutorial prepares inputs; a full prediction run requires your own method and compute.
Sources & details 5 sources
Discuss in your voice app
Take the reporting, visual explanations and original sources into a conversation. Copy the brief, paste it into your preferred assistant, then start its voice mode.
Paste the brief into your voice app to discuss this reporting.Revised 4 October 2026. Reporting and visuals refined. Original source dates and prior checks retained.
Reporting sources
- OpenADMET — new Structure Track
September 25, 17:15 UTC announcement, after the previous edition’s publication.
- OpenADMET — challenge rules
Submission format, chemical checks, report requirement and November 3 deadline.
- OpenADMET — structure tutorial
Complete notebook reviewed; prepares and checks inputs/outputs, rather than running the full model.
- OpenADMET — public challenge inputs
Downloaded without authentication: 20 input rows; experimental reference structures remain hidden.
- OpenADMET — submission portal
Portal reported running; API submission requires a Hugging Face token. No submission was made.
Images & figures
Chemical plausibility gates the primary score: a failing pose scores zero even near the hidden reference. The gradient is qualitative; twenty compounds have withheld cryo-EM structures. Tutorial preparation is not prediction, and structural agreement establishes neither inhibition nor clinical safety.